Contact: +91-9711224068
  • Printed Journal
  • Indexed Journal
  • Refereed Journal
  • Peer Reviewed Journal
International Journal of Anesthesiology Research

Vol. 7, Issue 1, Part A (2025)

Intranasal dexmedetomidine Vs intranasal midazolam in pediatric tonsillectomy

Author(s):

Sidharth B Venu, Mysa Abdul Azeez V, Venugopalan PG and Anupama Anitha Pavithran

Abstract:

Background: This randomized, double-blind study evaluated intranasal dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam as premedication in children undergoing tonsillectomy.
Methods: 100 children (ASA I/II, aged 6–12 years) were randomized to receive either intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) or dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg). Sedation, mask acceptance, hemodynamics, recovery, and postoperative outcomes were assessed.
Results: Satisfactory sedation was achieved in 86% of the dexmedetomidine group and 68% of the midazolam group (p=0.03). Mask induction was satisfactory in 84% and 70%, respectively (p=0.09). Postoperative agitation scores showed no significant difference (p=0.30). No patients experienced hypotension, hypoxia, or life-threatening complications between premedication and anesthesia induction.
Conclusion: Intranasal dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) is a safe and effective alternative to midazolam (0.2 mg/kg), offering superior sedation.
 

Pages: 07-10  |  56 Views  16 Downloads


International Journal of Anesthesiology Research
How to cite this article:
Sidharth B Venu, Mysa Abdul Azeez V, Venugopalan PG and Anupama Anitha Pavithran. Intranasal dexmedetomidine Vs intranasal midazolam in pediatric tonsillectomy. Int. J. Anesthesiology Res. 2025;7(1):07-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/26648849.2025.v7.i1a.48